 |
After the recent release of the new Boss GT-8
Guitar processor, I noticed a flurry of adverts on Musicads and in the newspapers, selling
off the older (but still good) Boss GT-6 and other similar processors. Now for some, the
reason for doing this is to help finance the upgrade - we've all been there! However, for
those who can afford to keep their older FX processor, there is a very attractive option
available - using the older unit in parallel with the new to do some very nifty things
indeed. While this article is written specifically with guitar in mind, this is not only
something guitarists can use! |
Parallel Effects
revisited
You will remember a while back I wrote an article on parallel effects - If not,
you can find it here. To sum up: When running effects in
parallel, we drive the inputs of two or more effects with the same source signal by
splitting it into two or more 'branches' or 'chains'. Then the outputs of the two branches
can be combined using a mixer. This gives a range of sound combinations not available with
series processing - allowing more than one different sound (like a clean sound and a
distorted sound) to be mixed together.
With two multi effects processors, you have the freedom to
take things further than you can with a few pedals - each branch can have it's own
overdrive and distortions, and even dedicated reverbs - which are often to processor
intensive to be able to have more than one in an effects unit. The icing on the cake is
that, with most FX processors made in the last 10 years or so, there will be amplifier,
speaker and even microphone modelling. The upshot of this all is that you can give each
branch it's own, distinct sound - in effect, making it sound like two different amplifiers
and even (with the right tricks) making it sound like a double-tracked guitar part. All
live and real-time.
The return of Splitting the Signal
The methods I previously mentioned for splitting the signal into two chains were:
splitting buffers (sometimes called 'Spluffers'), DI boxes, stereo mixers and stereo
effects. All these will still work, but with many multiFX processors you have even easier
and more flexible methods, namely:
Buffer Outputs - Many units have a
"buffer" output, specifically for driving other processors or amps. These
outputs give you an identical copy of what you are putting into your input, and are
obviously perfect for this application.
Tuner Outputs - Some units have tuner
outputs, which are basically glorified buffer outputs.
Effects Loops - Finally, we have the humble
effects loop, which is designed to allow you to insert one unit in the internal signal
path of another. Normally this is done with a send jack and a return jack (often two
returns, to allow for the return signal to be stereo). However, wiring it up this way
places the second unit in (plain old boring) series somewhere in the signal path of the
first. To use the second in parallel, you don't use the return jacks on the first unit -
you plug the outputs of both units into a mixer and the mixed signal to the amplifier. Of
course, you could use two amplifiers, one for each, but it is usually more practical to
have one.
 |
 |
| Conventional
method of using a second effects unit in the loop of another, effectively placing it in
series |
Connecting
the second unit so it is connected in parallel |
Where the effects loop is really powerful is
that the settings for the loop (on/off) can be written into a patch on the master unit
(usually your newer one) so you can have your second unit set up to work on one patch and
be switched out of the next - a very powerful feature. You will often be able to bypass
the effects loop via a pedal on the master unit too, allowing the second unit to be
bypassed with a floor pedal switch without changing patches.
Many better effects units will allow you to specify where the
loop is placed in the internal chain of effects, allowing you to use it before amplifier
and speaker emulation (for instance) in one patch and after it in another.
The Bride of MIDI
If your master effects unit is capable of sending out a MIDI program change
message, it is easy to plug a cable from the MIDI Out on the master to the MIDI In on the
second so that changing a patch via the pedal on one changes the patch on the second at
the same time. Take some time to read the manuals and find out if a nifty feature called
patch mapping is supported as this lets you have the second change to a different patch
number from the first.
The Return of the Son of Tips and Tricks
- Try a short (1-12ms) delay on the second unit. Use only the
wet signal, no direct - this can really make the two stand out from each other.
- Building on the last point, longer delays can be made to sound
really different from the original by using different amp and speaker sims.
- If you are working in studio (or anywhere where you can
experiment with stereo), take the time to position things carefully to get the best
separation between the sounds. I often like to have a dry sound panned on or near centre
with the second panning around the extremes.
- Keeping one sound relatively dry and tight with fewer and more
subtle effects will make sure that you can mix things to make it stand out, regardless of
how many effects are used for the second sound.
- Using similar reverbs on both sounds will make them mask and
blend together better - sounding like they are both being played in the same space. Using
different types of reverb can make them stand out from each other.
- Experiment and keep an open mind, some of the best sounds are
found by "happy accident"
Audio Examples
For some audio examples of what can be done, visit www.ratcliffe.co.za - I'll be putting up some
example mp3 downloads there. |